Friday, June 11, 2021

The subatomic particle has been seen switching between material and antimatter

 

 

 



What if we could turn material to antimatter and antimatter to material when we want?

 

Does the mass of the charm meson the thing, what determines is the particle formed matter or antimatter? There is an article about these topics at the end of this chapter. But is the reason, why there are no observations of antimatter in the universe something more fascinating?

The fact is that separating antimatter from the material is difficult except if the material contacts with antimatter that causes a huge explosion. And there is a theory that even in our galaxy are the antimatter stars. Also, the big annihilation after the big bang is pure theory. So if the big annihilation ever happened, there could be the antimatter galaxies in the universe.

The idea of why there was more matter than antimatter at the beginning of the universe is basing the idea that the Big Bang released material in the form of "8". That means there were two clouds. One was material and another was antimatter.

Was the Big Bang itself a little bit asymmetrical? That thing could explain why the "material won the antimatter". In this hypothesis, the Big Bang released two clouds of particles, and the smaller one turned to antimatter and the larger was the material.

When we are asking the question of why there is more matter than antimatter in the universe, we might think that the material released to the form of the two clouds. The other cloud formed by material and the other was formed by antimatter. Then the magnetic or gravitational pulling effect would pull those clouds together. And that caused annihilation, which eliminated the antimatter from the universe.

The reason why those two clouds were formed opposite versions of the material could be that the radiation that came from the Big Bang caused that the spin of the charm quark was opposite in those clouds. And if we are thinking that the Big Bang released material and antimatter to the universe the asymmetry in the bursts could explain why the antimatter was the minority and "lost the fight".

If we are thinking that the spin or rotation direction of the charm meson determines is the particle material or antimatter, we might have a little bit too simple an answer for the question, why there was more material than antimatter in the universe just after the Big Bang. The answer could be that the Big Bang happened on a certain side of the material. So the radiation, that came from the point, where the Big Bang happened caused that most of the particles turn into the material, and then the annihilation eliminated the antimatter from the universe.

()https://newatlas.com/physics/charm-meson-particle-matter-antimatter/

Image:()https://newatlas.com/physics/charm-meson-particle-matter-antimatter/




"Artist's conception of the NASA reference design for the Project Orion starship powered by nuclear propulsion" (Wikipedia, Project Orion)

What if we could turn material to antimatter and antimatter to material when we want?

If there is the possibility to change material to antimatter and back, that thing would open new fascinating and scary visions in the field of engineering, military, and security. The key to making that process can be found in the subatomic particle called "charm meson".

When the direction of the spin of charm meson is the thing, what determines are the material of the object or are they antimatter, that thing would allow storing data in the core of the proton what turns to the qubit and then change it to the antiproton, where the data is hard to collect, and if something unauthorized thing touches that data storage, this thing destroys the information.

And also the analysis systems would be destroyed. The thing that limits the use of antimatter as weapons or rocket fuel is the storage problems, but if the antimatter can turn back to the material, that thing solves the problem of using the most energetic thing in the universe.

The antimatter could form in the magnetic chambers, which might be the size of the normal bullet. If those antimatter bullets or Teller's bombs would not be needed, the antimatter can turn back to the material. Those Teller's bombs would be used also in spacecraft as propellants. The system would be the "Super Orion" the antimatter version of the "Orion" rocket, which uses nuclear detonations for traveling in the solar system. In "Super Orion" the nuclear bombs are replaced by using antimatter capsules. That could give more power to that system, what people even imagined.

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)





No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Every object in orbit could be an ASAT weapon.

   Every object in orbit could be an ASAT weapon.  Researchers are worried. That China’s space-debris catcher can turn into an ASAT, an Anti...