Is the thing exists even if we don't know about its existence?

There is a question in the article, what is linked below this text. And it goes like this. " Does a chair exist if nobody sits on it? Relational quantum mechanics says ‘NO!’(1). That is an interesting thing because the chair has no meaning for people around it. If nobody touches or uses the thing it does not exist.

Because it does not affect active things around it. The room and space around that thing are passive actors. For people in the room is same are they in that room or another room. The chair affects people only if they want to use the place, where the chair is for some other purpose or sit on the chair. Another way to ask the same thing is does anything existed if it cannot affect us or nobody uses it?

That is the problem with existence. Should something have some kind of effect to with us, that they have existed? Are things, that we cannot see, or what we ever think exist to us?  If we cannot see, feel, or taste the thing it cannot affect us. And what if we don't even know about that thing? Does it exist, because there is no knowledge about its existence?

I know that I have spoons and plates in the box of my kitchen. But they do not affect me at this moment because I cannot see or touch them. I know that they are there, but the fact is that I cannot be sure about that thing. There could be the "Black Swan" case, that somebody has slipped into my home, and stole those things from my kitchen.

Am I paranoid? Maybe maybe not. When we are thinking about the quantum hype, we must realize that the new tools and new technology are causing that the old-fashion quantum theories, which might seem useless are turned extremely interesting and important.

Things like Schrödinger's cat that is dead and alive at the same time are bringing new ideas in the mind of astronomers and quantum researchers. Could there be the black hole that is acting like Schrödinger's cat? What if the participants of double-star are a black hole and neutron stars? Could in that kind of system possible that the star is a neutron star and the black hole. In this hypothetical model, the state of that star would jump between the black hole and neutron star.

Could it possible that there is an object what is transforming between the neutron star and black hole? When the mass of the neutron star increases too high, that thing would crush it to the black hole. Then another black hole will pull the material from Schrödinger's star, and turns it back to the neutron star.

Theoretically, that thing requires that the neutron star orbits the black hole by using an extremely elongated trajectory, and when the neutron star is far away from the black hole, it turns to the black hole. And when it comes near the center of the system, that moe massive black hole will pull material from the smaller black hole and turns it back to the neutron star. Could this be possible? The answer is maybe.


(1)https://thenextweb.com/news/relational-quantum-mechanics-carlo-rovelli-syndication

Image:()https://thenextweb.com/news/relational-quantum-mechanics-carlo-rovelli-syndication