Going deep and dark in Universe

Why we want to see things, what happening 3,3  billion years ago?

Why do researchers want to see things like galactic clusters from 3,3 billion light-years? They want to see what happened in the past, and the thing that they are seeing from Earth in that galactic cluster happened 3,3 billion years ago. That thing would open new tracks for theories on how the material was formed, and probably that kind of research can along with research, what is done in CERN and other laboratories tell what was before quark-gluon plasma (QGP)?

 When did the energy turn to the material? The reason why I believe that the energy turned to the material is that otherwise quarks and gluons must come from the Big Bang as the form when we know those things, and that thing causes question, where that material what released from the Big Bang came from? Was that material came from some other universe from the past?

The fact is that the point, what released material to space and time must be very massive because the entire material in the universe was released from that point. But if the thing that released at that time was some kind of wave movement, we must also ask where that wave movement or radiation came from? Was the energy in the form of superstrings, what turned to quarks and gluons, and again, where those superstrings came from? What made them wrap to quarks and gluons?

The question is does dark and visible materials the same source? Or did those materials released separately?

Is dark energy the energy which source is straight in gluons and quarks?

The origin of dark energy is suspected of being in dark matter. Hypothetically the source of dark energy is the interaction of the dark matter. But there is another very interesting hypothesis. Another hypothesis for the source of dark energy is that when quarks or gluons are getting old, they are losing energy.

And sooner or later they release the energy impulse. The idea is that dark energy is like radioactive radiation, which source is in the quarks and gluons, which is turning sooner or later to the wave movement. And in that case, the source of cold dark energy is quarks, which are losing their mass. And the source of "hot" dark energy is in gluons, which are also losing their mass in radiation.

In this hypothesis, the gluons are sending more high frequent dark radiation than quarks. And the dark energy that is sent by quarks is cold. And the gluons are sending hot dark energy. That is one way to think about that mystery. Somewhere else I have written that the hypothetical hot dark energy is the interaction between the hot dark matter particles. And the source for cold dark energy is the interaction of cold dark matter particles.

******************************

So the dark energy could be:

Model 1

Hot dark energy = the radiation which comes from the core of gluon

Cold dark energy = the radiation which source is in the core of quarks

Or... maybe the source of dark energy is

Model 2

Cold dark energy = Interaction of cold dark matter particles

Hot dark energy = Interaction of the hot dark matter particles

************************************

But as we know, there is no proof of the existence of cold and hot dark matter. The theory of cold and hot dark matter is forming that the cold and hot dark matter exists, and that means their interactions would be similarly cold and hot dark energy.

The reason why researchers are interested in dark matter is that they hope to find the key to dark energy. The dark energy is the mystic force, that rips the universe in pieces. If researchers would find the route for observing that thing they can make more accurate calculations about the fate of the universe.

But dark energy offers endless power sources if that thing can benefit somehow. Theoretically benefiting dark energy requires that the array can put in the energy flow, and then the dark energy can turn to electricity, but a practical solution is harder to make.

Another big question in cosmology is dark matter. When the dark matter was released? Was it released at the same time with visible material, or was it released separately in the "dark big bang"? In that case, the dark matter released in the explosion, what formed the matter and radiation, what is not reacting with the visible material.

So was the Big Bang the reaction, where something just turned the dark matter into visible material? But that thing requires that dark matter exists before visible material. And the hypothesis about the "dark big bang" that released dark matter separately to the universe causes interesting thoughts that maybe there are dark big bangs all around the universe, what are releasing energy and material that cannot interact with visible material except by gravity.

The hypothetical "sterile neutrinos" could help to explain, why most of the universe consists of material that we cannot see. And where comes the mysterious dark energy, what is ripping the universe in pieces, but what can also offer a giant endless source of energy.

()https://www.livescience.com/giant-arc-in-space.html

()https://www.sciencenews.org/article/galaxy-giant-arc-3-billion-light-years-long-cosmology-space

()https://scitechdaily.com/portal-to-the-dark-side-sterile-neutrinos-an-intriguing-possibility-in-the-quest-for-understanding-dark-matter/

Image:()https://scitechdaily.com/portal-to-the-dark-side-sterile-neutrinos-an-intriguing-possibility-in-the-quest-for-understanding-dark-matter/