Could the Big Bang be the first and only time, when the energy turned to the material?

 

The idea is that the negative energy caused the Big Bang. But where that negative energy came from? Maybe it came from the black hole, what detonated in the giant singularity, what released all visible material and energy to the universe.

Maybe energy turned material only once. That thing happened in the Big Bang. Before the Big Bang entire material was in the black hole, and there is the possibility that there were many internal black holes. Then some of those black holes detonated because there was forming the "bubble of nothingness" inside that black hole. Then the shockwave traveled to the event horizon and turned the superstrings into ball-shaped particles or material.

If we are thinking that there are at least three types of material in the universe, hot dark matter, visible material, and cold dark matter. That thing means that there is the possibility that there were at least three internal black holes, which released their unique type of material to the universe.

The idea is that the internal black hole has a greater or higher energy load than the outer, even if it's smaller. When the higher energetic black hole detonates, the larger but lower energetic black hole cannot resist the internal gravity wave, which pushes the event horizon away. That thing causes that the black hole is exploding and the superstring is curving to the shape of the ball.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory

Can energy turn to material or not?

We don't know can energy turn to material in normal space. There is no answer for that in Einstein's Mass-Energy equivalence E=mc².

E= Energy (measured in joules, J)
m= Mass  (measured in kilograms, kg?
and
c= the speed of light. (measured in meters per second, ms -1 )

E=mc² is the formula, that tells how much material is transforming to energy. Einstein was a big man for his time, but even that kind of super-genius doesn't know everything. So the fact is that there should be counter-reaction for this kind of thing. If the mass or particular material is turning to energy, that means that the energy should have the ability to turn back to the material, but we cannot make that reaction in the real life.

Theoretically, the wave movement or superstrings should have the ability to turn to the ball, and the idea of the superstring theory is that the wave movement is the straight moving superstrings, and all quarks or some smaller particles are the balls, that are forming the superstrings.

So if the superstrings can turn straight what happens when the material is turning to wave movement, the same superstrings should have the ability to turn back to the form of the ball. But there is one little hole in that theory.

Nobody has ever seen the superstring and turned wave movement to the particle. Maybe that thing happened once in the Universe. The energy level of the Big Bang was enormous, and that thing might cause the situation where the superstrings turned to the material. But how the gravitational wave turned superstrings to ball-shaped from?

There is the possibility that the material that formed the Big Bang was in the internal black holes. And when the black hole in the great singularity explodes, that thing caused a reaction that it hits to superstrings, what was on the event horizon. Then that impact turned the heads of the superstrings to the form of the ball. And after that, the part of the superstrings turned to the material or ball-shaped particles, what was known as quarks and gluons.

()https://www.emc2-explained.info/Emc2/Basics.htm