Fire, culture, and alcohol

Many things that we think of as ordinary are extraordinary. We think that the human race is common species. But if we are expanding our scale we must realize that we don't know any other similar species. There are physically many similar species with us, but there is no other known technically and culturally advanced species on our planet, or anywhere else. We might think that the Sun is the common star because we see it every day. 

The Sun is not a common star and Earth is not a common planet at all. If we have eight planets in our solar system, Earth is the only planet that has a large mass of liquid surface water. There other objects in our solar systems where we can find oceans, but those oceans are covered by ice. The surface water and the tidal waves are causing the conditions that the species rise to drylands. 

Fire is the key element of advancing the culture. Fire gives warmth, and it can use to handle metals. 

The reason why humans learned to make fire is that humans needed that skill. But we don't know any other species, that can make fire. Then we might think about skills like making a fire. We can make fire by using matches or lighter, but can we make fire without that equipment?

What would you do if the woods are wet, and you need to make a fire? You can turn the starch into alcohol by using yeast and burn it in the dish.

 

We can make fire by rubbing the two pieces of wood against each other. In that case, friction is causing heat, which will start to burn the wood. If we have some kind of assistant like dry grass, we might make fire quite fast. And if we have alcohol, that thing makes making fire faster. We know Mesopotamians made beer and wine a long time ago. But did Mesopotamians drink that product so much?  Alcohol was a good thing to preserve things like vegetables. And that's why beer and wine are used in ancient Mesopotamia for many other purposes than just drinking. 

The strong alcohol or spree is excellent fuel, and it was probably made by putting the extra yeast and starch to the wine, and the yeast turned to wine to spree. Spree was an excellent tool for many purposes. If burning alcohol jar is thrown at the enemy it would be an excellent incendiary. The flames of burning alcohol are hard to detect. And that thing makes the alcohol itself an excellent weapon. So Molotov's cocktail was invented in ancient Mesopotamia.

Alcohol is thing that is suitable for many things, and it's a good disinfector. But it's also good fuel. Making the 96% spirit is quite an easy process. The years must only have starch, which turns to spirit, which can use as fuel. Alcohol can burn in the cauldron, and that thing is allowing to make fire also in the areas where the wood is wet. Surviving in wet and cold areas requires some kind of fuel, and strong alcohol is suitable for that purpose. We don't know any other species, that have the skill to make alcohol. 

Image:()https://jooinn.com/images/charcoal-on-fire-5.png

What if "Planet 9" is the blob of dark matter?

The artist's impression of "Planet 9"

If the hypothetical  "Planet 9" is formed of dark matter, that can explain why we cannot see it. But could the dark matter form the planet-mass objects? 

I just wrote about this thing. We must realize that dark matter is a mystery. But if there is about planet mass blob of dark matter in the Kuiper Belt, that can explain why we cannot see the mysterious object, what is causing the interference in the trajectory of Neptune. 

That thing explains why there are no gamma- or X-ray bursts in the Kuiper Belt, which are normally uncovering the existence of a black hole. There is a strange idea about dark matter what would explain dark energy. The same idea could explain the lack of dark matter in some galaxies. 

The blobs of dark matter around the black holes are sending radiation that can push dark matter out of the entire galaxy. The radiation source is in the dark matter can interact with dark matter. At this moment I must say that there are no wrong theories about the form of dark matter because nobody has seen dark matter itself. 

They can only see the gravitational interaction of dark matter and visible material. Only 15-20% of the material of the universe is visible to us. So the most dominating effect of the universe is missing. 

The Theory of the Dark Universe is one of the strangest hypotheses in the world. In that theory is claimed that dark matter can form things like planets and stars. Because those objects are formed of dark matter, they would be invisible to us. 

This strange hypothesis is called the "Theory of Dark Universe". In that hypothesis, the dark matter would be like the visible material. That means dark matter can form the stars and solar systems, what are sending radiation, what we cannot observe. The particles of dark matter could have a different size than the particles of visible material. So they are sending radiation, which we cannot see because there are no similar particles in the world of visible material. 

If we are thinking that dark matter is "just" material that is invisible to us, we can think that dark matter forms black holes.  So why the dark matter cannot also form other kinds of objects like stars and planets? Dark matter means invisible material and the source of dark energy would be in the oscillation of the dark matter. So if dark matter interacts similarly with visible material with other dark matter particles, there is the possibility that there is the so-called invisible universe. 

()https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210216-the-massive-planet-scientists-cant-find

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

Was a dark matter of the universe released before and after material that is visible to us?

Image:()()https://scitechdaily.com/surprising-dark-matter-theory-explains-mysterious-supermassive-black-holes-that-formed-early-in-the-universe/

Dark matter is a mystery. We know that it exists only because the gravitational interaction of dark matter affects stars, planets, and galaxies. There is no dark matter in all galaxies. And there are also areas where is no dark matter at all, which means that the dark matter is like visible material. 

It can form black holes like visible material, and in some theories, the dark matter is released before and after the visible material. The other remarkable thing is that we know that every black hole is surrounding by a blob of material and dark matter. 

When a black hole is oscillating the blob around it would send the radiation through space, and if the oscillation is affecting dark matter, that means that the radiation that source is in the dark matter would push other dark matter particles away. And that effect would be the dark energy. 

Dark matter can form black holes, but there is one very interesting theory about "Planet 9". That theory is that "Planet 9" would be the blob of dark matter, that orbits the sun. So if mysterious "Planet 9" is the planet-size blob of dark matter, that thing would explain, why it cannot be observed or seen. 

If we think that dark matter is released before and after the visible material, that thing can explain the theory of cold and hot dark matter. 

1) Hot dark matter would be high-energetic material that is released before visible material. The hot dark matter would be the source of hot dark energy, which wavelength is so short, that we cannot see it. The wavelength of hot dark energy would be higher than the gamma-ray area of the electromagnetic spectrum.

2)Cold dark matter would be low-energetic material released after the visible material. The cold dark matter would be the source of cold dark energy, which wavelength is so long, that we cannot see it. The wavelength of cold dark energy would be longer than the radio frequencies, and that means we cannot see that thing either. 

The new theory suggests that some black holes formed before the universe. 

In this text term "universe" means visible universe, and the idea of the black holes, what formed before the visible universe is basing the theory, that dark matter is released before visible material. Then the visible material was released to the universe, and first, it was in the form of radiation, which turned to quark-gluon plasma. When the temperature decreased, the quarks and gluons turned to hydrogen. 

So they started to form protons and electrons, but when the neutrons started to form.  And then something else must be happening, that hydrogen atoms are starting to form stars. There must be the whirl or some other interference, that caused the formation of the stars. The best candidate for the interference, what made the hydrogen forming the star is the black hole or group of black holes. 

Black holes are the only common thing, that is similar to the dark and visible material. The black holes are forming always in the same way. The cloud of material is dropping at one point and forming the singularity. Or the energy level of particles is rising so high that it will turn into a black hole. So the black hole is always similar without depending is it formed by dark matter or visible material. 

The black holes are crushing the stars and other objects, but they can also create new stars and galaxies. The galaxy is the material disk around the black hole, and when a black hole rotates, it would increase the size of the material disk. That thing causes interference, which is making the forming of stars and planets possible. So that kind of thing should happen also just after the Big Bang. 

If dark matter is released to the universe before and after the visible material. There could form black holes before the visible material released to time and space. Those black holes would make the interference, which formed the first stars. The thing that supports that kind of theory is the expansion of the universe. If dark matter is released before the visible material, there is a cloud of dark matter, which travels at the front of the visible material. And the gravitational interaction of this dark matter cloud is pulling the universe outwards. 

The dark energy would be radiation which source is in the interaction of dark matter particles. When the dark matter particle sends radiation. That radiation travels through the universe. The radiation travels until it impacts the particles that are on the other side of the universe. And that thing makes the expansion of the universe. 

()https://scitechdaily.com/surprising-dark-matter-theory-explains-mysterious-supermassive-black-holes-that-formed-early-in-the-universe/

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

Image:()https://scitechdaily.com/surprising-dark-matter-theory-explains-mysterious-supermassive-black-holes-that-formed-early-in-the-universe/

The new interfaces are making computing easier.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are allowing to control of computers remotely without any visible systems.  But BCI is not the only tool that can use in a new type of computing. The new gesture controls can also make it possible to make it smoother and easier to use computers.  

In the BCI, the control itself happens by using the EEG waves that are transmitted to the system by using the microchip, which can use WLAN, BlueTooth, or some other communication tool. This system can connect with a mobile telephone. Which makes it possible to use the BCI to control robots and computers over the Internet. 

The microchip that communicates with the computer can install surgically or it can be in a bandana. In that wearable system is the radio-based communication tool or laser-led. That makes it possible to control computers by using a WEB camera. 

In some futuristic visions, people could have smart contact lenses. On those contact lenses are blinking images like QR-codes. And every each of those images is connected with certain actions in the databases of the computer. 

The simplest model to use the WEB camera as the commanding tool for computers is simple. The person who uses the computer must only make certain gestures that are activating the actions in its operating systems. The simplest gesture that can be used to control the computer is blinking the eyes. The system can simply calculate how many times the user is blinking the eye and then select the mark, what it gets. 

This system can use along with the normal GUI (Graphical User Interface). The person would just make the gesture by moving the finger up or down. And then the blinking of eyes would start to connect with icons from up or from down. And then blinking another eye would activate the icon like pressing the buttons of the mouse. 

Blinking the right eye might mean the case where "shift" is in a normal position. When the left eye is blinking the system might translate that thing as pressing the "shift" button. This type of interface is easier to make than the BCI, and they are useful if the user is looking at the binoculars or telescope sights. 

That means that kinds of interfaces can use with smart technology in cases, where the person's hands are tied. The only needed thing is cameras that are detecting the blinks of eyes, and those cameras can install on the cap or helmet. 

In some other versions, the user of the BCI interface can use the glasses, where is the LED-screen, what shows the QR-codes to the system, what must be remote controlled. Those QR-codes activate actions, which are connected to the computer. 

The QR-code can be activated or changed by using an EEG monitoring system or following the eyes position and blinking it would show the certain QR-code. And that QR-code activates the action, what has connected it in the computer. The eye would aim at the certain symbol on the screen, and then the outer screen of the glasses would show the QR-code, which is activating the certain action of the icon. 

Image:()https://cdn.britannica.com/35/141135-050-3BC49521/Ubuntu-GNOME-Graphical-User-Interface.jpg

The new technology can make it possible to create compact-size but at the same time powerful ion and electron accelerating systems.

Why tennis-ball-size black holes formed after the Big Bang? The answer for that is that particles traveled at the extremely high -energetic areas, and the energy that came from the Big Bang made some particles black holes. The fact is that every kind of radiation that hits particles is increasing their energy level. The bright light can increase the energy level of the particles so high that they might turn into black holes. 

The new particle accelerator is combining two ways to increase the energy of the electron. The first one is just using the particle accelerator as the regular way. And then the laser rays are impacting those electrons, that are traveling in the electron accelerators. This technology is hybridizing quantum annealing and quantum accelerating. This kind of system is making it possible to create small-size but powerful particle or ion accelerating systems. 

This is one version of the so-called beam laser. In the beam laser, the electrons or ions are stressed with a laser ray. The difference between beam- and regular lasers is that the beam-laser is the hybrid system that packs a large part of the energy to the particles like protons or electrons.  The laser will increase the energy level of the ions or electrons. And that thing gives power to the particles, which are moving in the particle accelerators. Even the small particle accelerator can give very much power if the particles are traveling in the radiation, what if form by using lasers. 

When the electrons are traveling in the tube, where they are stressed with radiation, that thing will increase the energy level of the electrons. And that will make it possible to create new and powerful particle accelerators. When an electron or ion is traveling in the laser ray, that system pumps the energy to traveling particles, and this kind of system suitable for civil and military purposes. 

()https://physicsworld.com/a/new-electron-accelerator-combines-laser-and-plasma-wakefield-techniques/

()https://scitechdaily.com/straight-out-of-the-big-bang-new-type-of-gravitational-wave-detector-to-find-tennis-ball-sized-black-holes/

Image:()https://physicsworld.com/a/new-electron-accelerator-combines-laser-and-plasma-wakefield-techniques/

Is the thing exists even if we don't know about its existence?

There is a question in the article, what is linked below this text. And it goes like this. " Does a chair exist if nobody sits on it? Relational quantum mechanics says ‘NO!’(1). That is an interesting thing because the chair has no meaning for people around it. If nobody touches or uses the thing it does not exist.

Because it does not affect active things around it. The room and space around that thing are passive actors. For people in the room is same are they in that room or another room. The chair affects people only if they want to use the place, where the chair is for some other purpose or sit on the chair. Another way to ask the same thing is does anything existed if it cannot affect us or nobody uses it?

That is the problem with existence. Should something have some kind of effect to with us, that they have existed? Are things, that we cannot see, or what we ever think exist to us?  If we cannot see, feel, or taste the thing it cannot affect us. And what if we don't even know about that thing? Does it exist, because there is no knowledge about its existence?

I know that I have spoons and plates in the box of my kitchen. But they do not affect me at this moment because I cannot see or touch them. I know that they are there, but the fact is that I cannot be sure about that thing. There could be the "Black Swan" case, that somebody has slipped into my home, and stole those things from my kitchen.

Am I paranoid? Maybe maybe not. When we are thinking about the quantum hype, we must realize that the new tools and new technology are causing that the old-fashion quantum theories, which might seem useless are turned extremely interesting and important.

Things like Schrödinger's cat that is dead and alive at the same time are bringing new ideas in the mind of astronomers and quantum researchers. Could there be the black hole that is acting like Schrödinger's cat? What if the participants of double-star are a black hole and neutron stars? Could in that kind of system possible that the star is a neutron star and the black hole. In this hypothetical model, the state of that star would jump between the black hole and neutron star.

Could it possible that there is an object what is transforming between the neutron star and black hole? When the mass of the neutron star increases too high, that thing would crush it to the black hole. Then another black hole will pull the material from Schrödinger's star, and turns it back to the neutron star.

Theoretically, that thing requires that the neutron star orbits the black hole by using an extremely elongated trajectory, and when the neutron star is far away from the black hole, it turns to the black hole. And when it comes near the center of the system, that moe massive black hole will pull material from the smaller black hole and turns it back to the neutron star. Could this be possible? The answer is maybe.


(1)https://thenextweb.com/news/relational-quantum-mechanics-carlo-rovelli-syndication

Image:()https://thenextweb.com/news/relational-quantum-mechanics-carlo-rovelli-syndication

The previously unknown letter from Albert Einstein about the physics and biology

There is an image about that letter above the text, and here is one thing, what we must realize. Einstein was an intelligent and complex person, who had outstanding ideas. So when we are reading that kind of letter, we must realize those letters are meant for other geniuses. The fact is that Einstein predicted, that there was maybe some kind of physical phenomenon that makes animals acting like they are acting. 

The remarkable thing is Albert Einstein wrote this letter himself. That means that there could be the DNA of Einstein in the letter paper. And theoretically, this thing would make it possible to make the clone of Albert Einstein. Or maybe the DNA cannot transfer to morula, that thing makes it possible to detect the genome bites or base-pair sequences, which are connecting people like Albert Einstein.  

There have been introduced many interesting ways to connect nature to machines. There are at the same time weird ideas about the things like birds and bees. In some ideas, there are transmitted high-power radio waves through the bees. And the system would try to decode the memories of those bees. That thing would make it possible to use bees as the living spy machines. 

In some of the most unique and weird ideas, the bees would put in lines and their neural electricity can be used as an electric supply for nanomachines. The same neurons will also control the nanomachines and that thing is one of the most unique ideas in the world. 

The DNA and the nanomachines are excellent pairs. In some ideas, the DNA molecule acts like a spring could be connected with two nanotechnical generators. When spring will get longer and shorter the miniature generators are moving back and forth. That thing will make electricity at least nanomachines. 

()https://scitechdaily.com/recently-discovered-letter-written-by-albert-einstein-discusses-link-between-physics-and-biology-seven-decades-before-evidence-emerges/

()Image:()https://scitechdaily.com/recently-discovered-letter-written-by-albert-einstein-discusses-link-between-physics-and-biology-seven-decades-before-evidence-emerges/

Is the reality the game of quantum mirrors?

How do we see the electromagnetic frequencies that we are seeing?

Our eyes are transmitting reality to us. We cannot see any surface or layer straight. We are seeing only photons, which are reflecting from that layer, what we are looking at. We see the only reflection of radiation that hits the layer. If we would see thermal radiation, that makes it easier to hunt in the dark. But thermal radiation is far more difficult to use in writings and drawings. 

We are lucky that we see just those wave movement frequencies, what see and call the visible light. What if we would see the infrared frequencies but not the frequencies that we are thinking of as the visible light? How would we write or draw if we would see only the thermal radiation? 

Or how would we transmit our culture to our descendants if we would see only the ultraviolet radiation? How evolution created our eye like what it is? The ability to see thermal radiation would be more useful if we want to avoid beasts and hunt than the ability to see visible light. But the ability to see the frequencies, what we are seeing makes drawing and writing easier for humans. The little error in the eye makes the human ability to write and read texts, and that thing makes it possible to transmit the culture over generations. 

Is reality a game of quantum mirrors? 

What is the reality? That question has dominated the philosophy from ancient Greece. The fact is that we know that reality is the thing, what we are seeing, and what is affecting us. But we know that the world and its entirety is full of things, that we cannot see. We must remember that we are seeing only electron cores of atoms. 

Most of the mass of atoms is hiding behind the electron cores. We are seeing groups of atoms, that are forming the material. And then we must remember that the electron cores of atoms are not solid. Electrons are like small balls, which are orbiting the nucleus of the atom inside the quantum field. 

The quantum fields affect the trajectories of the photons, and then we must remember that the material is not solid. There are holes between quantum fields, and the photons are skimming around the material. That thing makes scattering radiation inside the formation of the atoms or their quantum fields, and that scattering radiation is denying other light travel across it. But is the entire universe or reality only reflection? One thing is sure we are seeing material and layers through reflection. 

The reason for that is we normally see only the radiation, what is reflecting from the layer, and that's why we can say that material or reality is the only reflection. The material and reality are not the same things at all. We can make the ultimate virtual reality by using the neuro-implants, which transmit the entirety of neuro signals from the transmitter to the receiver. 

So if the person would lay in the saltwater tank with the respirator, the system allows making the full-scale virtual experience of the zero-gravity conditions. The system doesn't require surgical operations. The only thing that is needed is the system that transmits the recorded EEG signals through the frontal lobe and entire brain tissue. 

And that means reality has nothing to do with the material. We can use technology for creating memories and experiences that are not real, but those things are real to us. For humans, the reality is the thing that we think is a reality. Our senses are putting a limit to the things that are seeing, and our eyes can see only a small part of the electromagnetic wave movement. Most of the wave movement is out of the human eye, and that thing has brought one vision in the head of philosophers. The most of sound frequencies are also out from our ears. 

()https://theconversation.com/is-reality-a-game-of-quantum-mirrors-a-new-theory-suggests-it-might-be-162936

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_reflection

()Image:()https://theconversation.com/is-reality-a-game-of-quantum-mirrors-a-new-theory-suggests-it-might-be-162936

The misbehaving muons can open new paths for physics.

M42 Orion nebula

The Muon G-2 experiments have shown one thing. The advancing observation technology showed that physics and all other areas of sciences are advancing. Advancing science brings advancing products in front of the people. One sure thing is unsure. Some people believed that the Standard model was ready, and there must not do anything with that. And then the muons started to misbehave against theoretical models.

So that thing has brought one question to the mind of people. That thing is that even the most calculated theories might be wrong or they need expansions. The observations about the misbehaving muons have shown that there could be unknown natural forces. Are the four known natural forces one primordial force?

The hunt for primordial force carries on, and the Muon G-2 experiments have opened a new path for physics. There is the possibility that we are facing a new type of opportunity in front of us. The idea of primordial force is simple. All four natural forces or interactions are the same force, that travels from the nucleus of atoms through the electron cores and finally between atoms. The theory of the primordial force goes like this: the origin of that force is in the gluons, the transportation particles of the strong nuclear force.

When gluons are jumping back and forth between quarks, they are pushing the quark. That thing causes the wave of energy that travels through the electron core. When the gluon impacts with quark it transports energy to it. And that means gluon must get its energy from somewhere. The idea is that the thing that keeps quarks and other particles in the form is something like quantum gravity.

When some particle is sending or transfer energy to some other particle, that thing means that the particle is losing a little bit of itself. The effect is similar to when two balls or other our scale of objects hit together. They are sending soundwave through the air. The scale of quarks and muons is far smaller than some kind of tennis balls, but they are acting the same way.

Energy acts similar way with sound. When particles are impacting they are sending energy waves around them. Same way quark is sending the energy wave around it when gluon impacts it. And that energy could be the mysterious primordial force. So every natural interaction is the same force all the time.

()https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/could-misbehaving-muons-upend-the-known-laws-of-physics

()https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg25033400-800-the-hunt-for-a-primordial-force-that-would-revolutionise-cosmology/

()https://www.space.com/four-fundamental-forces.html

Image:()https://www.pixel-creation.com/21563/10-most-popular-orion-nebula-wallpaper-1920x1080-full-hd-1080p-for-pc-background/

A futuristic nanotechnology-based antimatter engine can make aircraft, which seems to break the laws of physics.

 

 

 

 Artists impression of  the "sport model UFO"



I'm sure that there have been talkings or "study projects" about the possibility to make antimatter engines for some aircraft. Antimatter is so powerful energy source, that can use in nanotube-based antimatter engines. The model of the system is simple. The high-energetic electrons are shot through the gold layer and that thing can make it possible to make the most fundamental aviation solution in history.

Antimatter could be excellent fuel also for "normal" aircraft. It could deliver so much energy, that the nano-size engines can carry even large-size aircraft.

These kinds of systems are interesting and at the same time powerful things. But they might still in the stage of the study project. During those projects, engineers and scientists are making models for how to store antimatter for long-term missions. One version is to make necessary antimatter in the vehicle itself.

Thre is possible that the entire layer of the aircraft would cover with engines, which are aimed in all directions. That kind of thing can make the system what looks like breaking the laws of physics. But the problem is: how to make that thing in practice. One version is to make that kind of system is to use the nanotubes and antimatter system. If that kind of system is possible to make, that means that the creators of these kinds of aircraft would be sure, that their product is seeming to break the laws of physics.

The nanotubes can be used to create antimatter quite "easily".  High-energetic electrons would drive through the nanotube, where is created the particle accelerator. And at the end of the nanotube is the small and thin bite of gold. The only thing that the system must do, is to drive electrons through the nanotube.

And let it interact with air molecules, which makes the annihilation what gives enormous energy for the aircraft. By using nanotechnology is possible to cover the entire aerial vehicle with nanotubes, where the electrons would shoot to air.  If the entire outer layer is full of nanotubes, that thing can give the system more maneuver abilities than any other engine system in the world.

Infrared- and laser systems make it possible to observe bodily functions remotely.

Therminal image systems can detect some cancers. The cancer tissue is a little bit warmer than other tissues. And that means some cancers like skin and breast cancers can be seen remotely by using infrared systems, and that thing would be healthier than using the X-ray systems.

Maybe the infrared systems cannot detect cancer very accurately, but they can help to find people who should go to cancer tests. The infrared systems can easily measure body temperature from long distances. So the infrared systems can detect people who have fewer from large groups of people very easily.

Measuring the body temperature of people remotely is quite easy. The same infrared thermometers that plumbers are using can use to measure the body temperature of people. That kind of infrared system can help to keep safe distances between patients and medical staff in a time of epidemics. Those kinds of systems are allowing to keep people safe against viruses and bacteria.

When rescue crews are coming to the places after massive disasters. Finding living persons is extremely important because the aid must focus on living people. At the moment of the large-scale accidents, there are so few rescue operators for large groups of people. Focusing the aid on the right people is the most important thing at that moment.

There is no time to waste helping people who are not injured or who are dead and who cannot help anymore. There should be systems that can detect if the person is living remotely. The system can use infrared cameras and lasers for searching if the heart of the person is pumping.

The infrared camera sees if the person is warm. And the laser can measure if the victim's heart is acting by following the movements of the chest. The laser can measure the pulse in veins by following the movements of the skin. And even if that kind of system is not suitable for accident situations. It can use to measure the pulse remotely. These kinds of things are more hygienic than the regular stethoscopes.

Image:()https://healthyimages.co/can-thermal-imaging-detect-cancer/

The ancient skeletons of flying dinosaurs can use as models for a new type of flapping-wing drones.

Image: Pinterest

New materials are allowing to make the large-size flapping-wing drones, and the things like flying dinosaurs can act as a model for this kind of system. The system might contain sophisticated artificial intelligence, which can control the movements of the wings very accurately. So every articulation can work as the entirety, what acts like the ancient flying dinosaurs.

The skeleton of flying dinosaurs can act as the model of how to make the new type of low-enduring aircraft and drones, which can glide very long time. The largest flying dinosaurs were the size of Spitfire fighter, and their skeleton can use to make the model of aircraft, which can fly an extremely long time. Making the artificial dinosaur might be easier than people thought. Moder strong materials and power systems are making this kind of robot possible. That kind of drone can have many types of sensors like cameras, radars, laser-radars, and sonar systems, which can be used to search things in air, ground, and underground.

The joints of the skeleton can model the articulations of the aircraft which wings can act the same way with the flying dinosaur. Those wings can use modern computer technology for adjusting their angles. And the skeleton of the machine can be made by using carbon fiber. The skin of that artificial flying dinosaur can create by using nylon or some other strong plastic types like mylar or kevlar. The variable wing geometry is allowing them to travel at high speed by using the miniature jet engine.

And artificial intelligence can also shut the engine down when it is no needed. The skin of this system might have solar panels for creating power for the system, and it can also have fuel cells for making power when the engine is not operating. The drone can search the rising airflow by using lidar. Modern materials like carbon fiber and strong plastics are allowing to make also large-size flapping-wing drones. And the drone can be made by using the skeleton of flying dinosaurs as the model.

Can the planet turn into a black hole, or can the planet-mass black hole be possible?

If a black hole pulls only radiation in it that could make it possible that the small-size black hole can be a long-term phenomenon. But it can cause that there is no X- or gamma-ray radiation near it. And that kind of thing makes it possible that the planet-mass black holes might be stable but invisible. The requirement for stability is that the black hole can replace its mass, which it loses as Hawking's radiation by using material or radiation.

Is mysterious "Planet 9" one of those extremely small-size black holes?

The new gravitational wave sensor is made for detecting the black holes which size is about the tennis ball from far away. There is the possibility that those miniature black holes formed in Big Bang, but the strong radiation may turn the planet into a black hole. That requires that the energy level of the planet turns so high, that inside it or its atmosphere will form a black hole.

That thing can happen, when the planet is traveling through the radiation burst of the black hole, or when the star is pumping energy to that planet faster than the planet can release it. So if the energy level of an object is high enough, that thing causes that the planet is transforming into a black hole.

Those black holes could be extremely interesting because they can hide almost everywhere in the universe and if one of them is found at Kuiper Belt, that thing can give the unlimited energy source for the entire human race, but that requires that the black hole is stable. The new gravity sensors are searching them far away, but there is a small possibility that one of them could be the thing, that causes the errors in the trajectory of Neptune.

So how that kind of black hole could be stable without visible nuclear reactions of its transition disk? When the black hole pulls material in it, it would send the gamma- and other kinds of radiation from its material disk, and if the black hole would not pull material inside it, it starts to vaporize. There is one little possibility that the black hole would pull only wave movement or radiation in it. That thing makes it possible that the small black hole would live longer without sending other than gravitational waves as the mark of its existence.

The idea of the planet-mass black hole might seem very unusual, but the fact is that when the sun of the planet would get the energy from its sun, it causes that energy to be stored in the planet. When the energy hits the planet its mass and energy level is starting to rise, and if the planet cannot conduct energy anywhere, it can turn even into a black hole.

There is no limit to the energy, that travels in Lorentz's strange attractor. The Lorentz strange attractor is the model of the system, what energy level rises until it can release it somewhere. The energy level rises until the energy is transfer to some other object or the outcoming energy stress is ending. The energy level in Lorent's strange attractor rises until the outcoming energy pumping ends. So that kind of thing causes a question could the magnet field turn so powerful that it can turn to a black hole? Can the wave movement itself turn to the black hole, or does it need particles?

The planet-mass black holes were thought to be a pure science fiction phenomenon until there was found a planet named KELT-9b, which was hotter than its star. That thing caused an idea, what if a similar phenomenon would happen on the planet, what is farther from its star. That kind of exoplanet could orbit the blue star, and there is the possibility that the energy level of the planet rises so high, that the planet would crash into the black hole.

Gas planets like Neptune shine more energy than they get from the sun. And the source of that extra energy is the friction in the atmosphere. There is the possibility that the atmosphere of some gas planet is forming the double-typhoon, which acts like Lorentz's strange attractor. If the friction on the planet is low enough.

And the energy cannot transfer anywhere. There is the possibility that the atmosphere of the planet is forming a black hole. That small black hole pulls the entire planet in it. This is the thing, that makes Lorentz's strange attractor or butterfly effect so dangerous. There is no limit to the energy level of Lorentz's strange attractor. If the energy level of the system is turning high enough. It would turn into a black hole.


()https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2020/06/03/is-planet-nine-actually-a-black-hole-in-the-solar-system-theres-only-one-way-to-find-out/

()https://www.space.com/kelt-9b-hottest-exoplanet-tearing-apart-hydrogen-molecules.html

()https://scitechdaily.com/straight-out-of-the-big-bang-new-type-of-gravitational-wave-detector-to-find-tennis-ball-sized-black-holes/

()https://www.universetoday.com/151646/gravitational-wave-detector-could-sense-merging-primordial-black-holes-with-the-mass-of-a-planet-millions-of-light-years-away/

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

()Image:()https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/merger-2000x1200.jpg

Zero-point energy can give endless energy sources if it can turn into electricity.

Could the dream of using zero-point energy become true someday? The problem with benefiting the zero-point energy is that the energy level of the system is so low. The source of that energy is in the oscillation of the subatomic particles.

Every nucleus of the atoms is surrounding the quantum fields. A similar energy field is surrounding every subatomic particle in the universe. Those oscillating quantum fields can be used as an energy source, but the problem is that the energy level of those quantum fields is so low, that there is the possibility that the system cannot work.

But there are made theoretical solutions, how to benefit that energy. In one version the system consists of a network of superconducting transistors which are making the oscillation stronger. In some other versions, the power of the oscillation of the subatomic particles is collected by using the capacitor, which uses superconducting condensate. And when the energy level is high enough in that superconducting capacitor the system can deliver its energy to the electric network. 

()Image :()https://www.sciencealert.com/decades-long-experiment-finds-strange-mix-of-antimatter-in-the-heart-of-every-proton

Term zero-point energy (ZPE) means the lowest possible energy level, which quantum systems may have. Using that kind of energy as an energy source seems utopistic, but the reality is that things like subatomic particles in the nucleus of atoms are oscillating. And that oscillation sends energy around the objects. But can that energy use someday? Maybe the oscillation itself cannot use as the energy source, but the antimatter can use as energy production.

Can the antimatter that is stored in protons be the key to a zero-point energy source someday in the future.

The answer for that thing is "maybe someday we can use zero-point energy". There is the storage of the sub-atomic antimatter particles in the regular protons. Those anti-particle-particle pairs will turn energy the same way with atomic antimatter particles. So the problem is how to make the subatomic antimatter-material particles interact together.

If those material-antimatter particles would annihilate, that thing releases energy. One version of the system, that can benefit this energy of the subatomic particles could be the system. That rips the protons in pieces by using magnets and then those subatomic antimatter-material pairs will shoot together.

In some other hypothesis, the subatomic particle-antiparticle pairs will press together by using the magnetic field, what is pushing the proton in the smaller size, and the magnetic push will make the annihilation inside the proton. But this type of thing is only a pure hypothesis.


Could the antimatter the reason why protons and neutrons are turning to wave movement?

There is antimatter inside every single proton.  Between quarks is the subatomic antiparticle-particle pairs, which are separated by the gluons. Or this is what I think about the reason why the particle-antiparticle pairs are not touching with each other. Proton would deliver energy in the oscillation, which source is in the interaction between gluons and quarks.

When the gluon is moving between quarks, it pushes the quark a little bit, and in that process, the proton or the link, which keeps the proton together would release a little bit of its energy, which affects quantum gravity in the proton. When the size of the proton increases. That thing causes that sooner or later the particle-antiparticle pairs in the proton will annihilate. And that internal annihilation is destroying the proton. So the internal energy release will destroy protons.

()https://www.sciencealert.com/decades-long-experiment-finds-strange-mix-of-antimatter-in-the-heart-of-every-proton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy

What else the dark matter could be, except the independent version of material?

Should we understand gravity better?

Is dark matter exists or are we just misunderstand gravity? The fact is that we don't know anything about gravity.  We don't know even is gravity an independent force or not. If gravity is an independent force or interaction that thing means that it should have ow transporter particle.

And the thing is that there is the theory that the graviton, the hypothetical transporter particle is pulling the string between objects. And then those strings would start to pull the objects together. So graviton would be like a gluon, the particle, which keeps the quarks in the protons and neutrons, and the question is could the graviton be the gluon, which only interacts in long distances. In some theories, the graviton is the mirror- or pair of gluons the transporter particle of the strong nuclear force, which keeps quarks in the neutrons and protons.

If we are thinking about that theory sharply. That theory claims that every single particle is containing graviton. So could we find graviton between quarks and gluons?

And this could mean that gluons have graviton pairs. Or could gluon itself be graviton? And graviton is the long-range gluon.  But that is the pure theoretical thing. Nobody has seen a single graviton yet, and the existence of the graviton is purely a hypothetical thing.

But what if gravity is pushing force? The idea of this theory is that quantum fields are like water. If there is a hole or pit in the universe, the quantum fields will fill it like water. So in this version quantum fields or gravitons are pushing objects.

So if we are thinking this theory more accurately the object removes the quantum field from its position. In the place of the objects is a weaker quantum field than in other places in the universe. That weaker quantum field would be like the pothole in the universe. And the other objects are starting to fall in the effective area of that weaker quantum field. So the filling pothole of the quantum field would cause the effect, what is called gravity.

But what else the dark matter could be than just material? Dark matter interacts with visible material only by gravity And that interaction is the thing, that uncovers the existence of that mysterious thing, what just exists, but that is the only thing, what we know about that thing.

There are three versions of the possibility of the form of dark matter. Of course, dark matter could be the energy. But what else that thing could be?

1) Dark matter could be one or two independent versions of the material. And the reason why we cannot see that material is that the particles of dark matter have a different size than visible material. So the dark matter sends the radiation that cannot interact or induct itself to visible material. And the radiation that dark matter sends has so different wavelength than the radiation that visible material sends.  This thing would be the reason that we cannot observe it and that dark radiation or wave movement cannot interact with visible material.

2) Dark matter is only the overenergetic material. In that case, the particles are traveling in the universe and the cosmic radiation will stress them. Because that material or particles cannot transfer the radiation anywhere, they would turn overenergetic material. And the microgravity fields of those particles would turn stronger. That means that the mass of those particles is higher than other particles around them.

3) Dark matter is pure gravitons. So there are flowing the graviton clouds around the universe. And those gravitons are invisible for radiation because their size is so different than other particle's size. Or in some other versions of the graviton theory, gravitons would be the quantum-size black holes, that are pulling wave movement in themselves. So the oscillation of those hypothetical quantum-size black holes could be the source of dark energy. Or one source of the dark energy, the mysterious force, which rips the universe in pieces.

But as you see every single recommendation for the form of dark matter is a purely theoretical thing. Before researchers are capturing dark matter particles, they cannot say anything sure about the dark matter.

()https://phys.org/news/2021-06-dark-real-misunderstood-gravity.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

 Image:()https://phys.org/news/2021-06-dark-real-misunderstood-gravity.html

The negative energy itself is not "negative"

 

 

There are many writings about negative energy and when we are looking at the thing, what is called "negative energy", we might think that negative energy is the energy, that is forming in the nuclear reactions inside the black hole or wormhole. When particles are dropping through the event horizon, they are continuing their interactions.

And there is the possibility that there happen even fusion reactions inside the black hole. The energy level in a black hole cannot increase forever. When inside the event horizon of the black hole happens the fusion reaction, that thing causes a situation where the energy is acting like air in the balloon. When the pressure is rising too high, the balloon is exploding.

The same way energy is acting in the black hole. It raises the pressure behind the event horizon. When the energy level in the black hole is rising too high, the energy would break through the black hole and event horizon. There is the possibility that the theoretical wormholes, which are the energy channels through the universe would keep open the fusion reactions of the particles inside the energy channel. So the negative energy is the thing that travels out of the black hole.

But when we are thinking about the black hole, we must understand that there are always particles that are escaping from it. And black holes are not interacting only by gravity. Black holes are surrounded by material and dark matter. And when the black hole is oscillating that thing causes the situation that the dark- and visible material is sending the wave movement.

That wave movement is pushing the material away from the black hole. So there is the possibility that there are areas, where the quantum fields are weaker than other places in the universe. But that requires the existence of dark matter, there have been articles that dark matter has not existed.

And we are misunderstanding the form of gravity or some part of that thing. So at this point, I must say, that we don't know anything about gravity itself. And if gravity is the force, and the graviton exists, there is a very small possibility that dark matter is the free gravitons.

The black hole and "bubble of nothingness".

There is the possibility that there is no absolute emptiness in the entire universe. But there is the possibility that there are areas where the quantum fields are remarkably weaker than in some other areas.

Inside the universe are giant bubbles, where is nothing. In those bubbles seems that there is no gas or anything else. There is no possibility that in the normal universe are areas where are no quantum fields or particles. But near the black hole is a possibility that the black hole would just pull the entire material and radiation away near the black hole.

And because the black hole is pulling the material and wave movement in it, there is the possibility that the wave movement or electromagnetic radiation would travel through the massive star, which is orbiting the black hole. Then that thing makes the case, where the star turns over-energetic. And the magnetic field of it would turn extremely powerful, because of the radiation emission, which interacts with atoms and ions, that are forming that star.

()https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/negativeenergy/negativeenergy.htm

()https://phys.org/news/2021-06-dark-real-misunderstood-gravity.html

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy

Image:()()https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/negativeenergy/negativeenergy.htm

Nuclear batteries can make carbon-free energy for power plants and even full-size nuclear submarines.

Image Source: ()https://scitechdaily.com/nuclear-batteries-offer-a-new-approach-to-carbon-free-energy/

Large-size nuclear batteries are one version of the systems that can deliver energy to people without carbon. The problem with isotope batteries is that the radioactive nuclear elements are really dangerous in the wrong hands. If somebody harms the nuclear element the results can be devastating. So the answer to this problem could be the C-14 based artificial diamonds, which are one of the toughest materials on Earth.

The new radioactive carbon-based batteries can also use C-14 based carbon fiber, which is allowing to make the new forms for the nuclear elements of the isotope batteries. The new type of isotope batteries can use in local power production units. But f the power supply for the isotope batties is high enough they are also suitable for nuclear submarines. Nuclear batteries can make submarines drive silently because the sound of the cooling water of the reactor is removed.

The large-size isotope batteries can give a long-term power supply for submarines. Nuclear batteries can operate without similar risks to what the nuclear reactors have. Nuclear batteries can also use in miniaturized submarines and cars. And they can give small vehicles like UDV the same operational range and time as full-size submarines, but also the full-size nuclear submarines could use nuclear batteries if the system can give enough power.

Also, normal-size helicopters that have a pushing propeller can use nuclear batteries. That system makes those electric-powered futuristic helicopters faster.

Nuclear batteries can also give power supply for the drones like miniaturized spy planes and quadcopters. That thing makes it possible that "Aquila" and "Predator" remote-controlled aircraft and quadcopters can operate even years without the need for energy supply. That means that the small-size aerial and submerged vehicles can operate in the area of the entire world.

But the use of nuclear batteries can use in the quadcopters, which are sent to the other planets for researching the landscape. The similar nuclear-powered helicopters that are used on the planet Mars can hover in the high atmosphere for months or even years. And those small helicopters can be used in many missions like observing the tectonic plate movements, measure air pollution, or in the military sector for recon, targeting, and surveillance missions.

()https://scitechdaily.com/nuclear-batteries-offer-a-new-approach-to-carbon-free-energy/

 

Quantum entanglement alone doesn't allow faster-than-light communication. It also requires that the particles are in superposition.

The virtual faster than light communication is possible only if the particles are superpositioned and entangled. If the particles are superpositioned, that means the two particles in the system are actually the same particle, and if the other part of the superposition is moving, the other part is also moving. 

So if we want to send a message to Alpha Centauri by using superpositioned particles for that thing is theoretically quite an easy process. We must just send the superposition to the Alpha Centauri system. And then we just need to move the particle pair to front and back. In that case, the particles are acting like they are extremely long stick acts. But getting the superposition to Alpha Centauri needs 4,5 years. 

Can we communicate between Earth and Alpha Centauri faster than light? Real-time communication is not the synonym for faster-than-light communication. We could make the real-time communication channel between Earth and as an example Alpha Centuri "quite easily". We must just make a stick, what we are moving back and forth. 

That kind of stick could be the chain of ions or electrons that is put in the quantum channel or virtual wormhole. The purpose of the laser ray is to protect the chain of particles, that are in it. So in this case the system would not cross the speed of the light. It just moves the chained particles back and forth. The chain of particles is acting like an extremely long cartridge, where is 4,5 light-years long rod. 

There is the possibility that somewhere in the future, between Earth and Alpha Centauri, is created the quantum channel by using laser ray. Inside this laser-ray will put electrons in the chain. Or in other versions, the electron would superposition between Earth and Alpha Centauri, and then those electrons will more back and forth. Getting laser ray and superposition between Earth and Alpha Centauri takes 4,5 years. But when the channel is ready, real-time communication between solar systems is possible. 

The motive for that kind of project is a different thing, but the same system, the chained particles can use to control the probes in the outer areas of the Solar system. Quantum communication is one of the most interesting things in the world. If that system is made someday, it allows controlling probes and other things outside the solar system. But getting probes to the extremely long distances takes time. 

Image:()https://gcn.com/articles/2017/02/21/space-comm-laser.aspx

Can we someday use gravitational waves as an energy source?

 

 

Can we someday use gravitational waves as an energy source?

 

Gravitational waves are a mystery. And the thing that we know about that effect is the source of gravitational waves is the extremely high energetic reactions in the universe. The collisions of black holes are the source of the gravitational waves.

And the fact is that the gravitational waves can be caused by waves of dark matter, which would be the same way fundamental finding as the finding of the graviton. We don't even know are the gravity waves are caused by gravity itself or are gravitational waves the impulses, what is causing the interaction in the dark matter. Or could the source of gravitational waves the interaction that is sending dark matter forward in the universe?

After more research, maybe someday in the future, scientists can find out, if the source of gravitational waves is dark matter? Or is the burst of the gravitons which are hypothetical transportation particles of gravity the reason why gravitational waves are traveling across the universe? Maybe someday in the future, the gravitational waves answer the question, is gravity a force or not, and is graviton true or not.  

But can we someday use the gravitational waves as an energy source? That thing could be possible if the system uses Lorenz's butterfly or Lorentz's "Strange attractor" in this kind of process. The key element in this kind of system is that the outcoming energy is stronger than the energy loss in the system. That kind of system is one way to benefit the invisible energy or gravitational waves.

Lorenz's strange attractor. (Wikipedia)(()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect)

There have been introduced a couple of futuristic ways to transform gravitational waves into electricity.

 

There is a possibility to use gravitational waves as an energy source by using a similar system with LIGO. The simplest way is to put the laser ray between the silicon layers, and the gravitational waves are causing stretching in that laser ray.

In some more advanced models is used the electrons which are in line or chains. Or they can be superpositioned in the laser ray. When the gravitational wave hits to laser ray, it will increase the energy of that ray. That energy would transfer to the electrons which are moving back and front in the "basket" or antenna, made of graphene. That kind of system might be real sometimes in the future.

That means that the energy level of the laser ray will rise, and if the system is superconducting, that effect causes an increasing the energy level of that system. That thing is theoretically possible if the system is using Lorentz's butterfly model.

The energy level of the system would increase until the system can conduct that energy somewhere.  If the power circuit is using the butterfly effect it can transform even the gravitational energy to electricity but the main requirement is that the resistance or loss of power is lower than the effect that brings the energy to the system outside.

So when the gravitational wave hits the laser ray, that will increase its power, and that power can increase the power of the system. The light must only travel in the form of "8", and then the system must get more energy than it uses. Easier to describe than making in practice.

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

Maybe the Big Bang was not the beginning of the universe.

There have been many articles about that topic. And I must say that anyway the answer to that question is in every case yes and no. Space itself existed before the Big Bang, and then that event released at least visible material to space. That material formed the entirety, what is called the universe. Or rather saying the part of the universe that we can touch or feel.

The major question is "was the dark matter released at the same time when the visible material released in the great emptiness". And the second thing is when the material or the form of material as we know that started to form. When the Big Bang released material in space and time the form of the material was different. It was high-energetic quark-gluon plasma and the main question is what was before quark-gluon plasma?

Dark matter and dark energy are the most mysterious things in the universe. So if we are thinking that if the dark matter has similar abilities with visible material, could there be the anti-version of dark matter or simply saying anti-dark matter? Is there some kind of mirror version of dark matter? Like normal antimatter is the mirror-version of the visible material exist?

An interesting induction question of that hypothesis is the could both versions of dark matter, cold dark matter, and hot dark matter have their antimatter particles? So if that thing is true there are six forms of matter. In the universe could be anti-dark matter versions of the hot and cold dark matter. And the anti-version of visible matter.

When an antimatter particle touches the particle of material, that causes that both participants of impact turn to wave movement in this extremely rough reaction. Could anti-dark matter a real thing? could there be a similar version of antimatter as the form of dark matter? Could the anti-dark matter be a real thing? And could that thing cause the "invisible annihilation" which sends radiation, that we cannot observe?

And the hypothesis about the anti-dark matter brought to my mind the idea that could the source of dark energy be the annihilation between the dark matter particles? Maybe this thing will prove right or wrong someday.

Dark matter is the major part of the universe. Observing that material, what cannot react with any kinds of known material happens by benefiting the gravitational effect of the dark matter. And those observations are shown that there are areas in the universe where is no rad matter at all. That means that dark matter is acting similarly to visible material.  

And then we can say, that dark matter could be the source for dark energy, the mysterious force that is ripping the universe in pieces. How dark energy is ripping the universe in pieces, but it cannot interact with the material.

The thing that can cause the universe's expansion could be the cloud of dark matter what is outside the visible material. And the oscillations of the dark matter particles in that cloud cause the dark energy, which is ripping the universe into pieces. The dark energy will be acting through the universe. When the particle is oscillating it sends the energy without depending is the particle visible or dark matter.

So if the source of the dark energy is the dark matter oscillation or interaction between dark-matter particles, that means that when the dark matter particle sends the radiation, that radiation interacts with the particle, which is another side of the universe. Then another version of this kind of theory goes like this.

When material released into space, part of it dropped back to one entirety and formed the giant black hole. There is a blob of dark matter around the large black hole in the center of the universe. When that blob of dark matter oscillates it sends the radiation that pushes the dark matter cloud ahead of the visible universe.

And that gravitational interaction causes the expansion of the universe. If the large cloud of dark matter causes the expansion of the universe. That means the dark matter could release to the universe at a different time than visible material. Or maybe the radiation of that dark matter blob just pushes dark matter ahead of the visible material.

But the dark matter could get ahead of the visible material otherwise.   Because the dark matter was not interacting with visible material it passed the chaotic young universe because the visible material's annihilation radiation does not affect the trajectories of those particles. In the young universe formed antimatter and material. And when those particles touched together that formed energy, that caused the chaos, where the material was whirling. The annihilation radiation affected only particles of visible material. And that means the particles of dark matter traveled faster because their trajectories were straight.

In that version, the dark matter passed the chaotic material in the young universe. And dark matter travels ahead visible material. In the chaotic universe, the material was vibrating and whirling. The dark matter just travels straight and it was getting ahead of visible material forming the hypothetical cloud of dark matter around the universe.  Dark matter can form black holes what are only known as a common phenomenon between dark and visible material.

Or there is possible that there are two types of dark matter. And if dark matter is the source of dark energy, those two hot and cold dark matter types send two different types of radiation. The cold dark matter sends cold dark energy, and the hot dark matter sends hot dark energy.

And if we think that there are two types of dark energy, cold and hot dark energy, which wavelengths are different. Hot dark energy is the extremely high-frequent radiation and cold dark energy is the extremely long wavelength radiation. And those radiations are between the electromagnetic spectrum, we might think that the visible material is the middle energetic material, because the source of dark energy is dark matter. Visible material was release happened between the cold and hot dark matter.

We can see only a little part of the universe

When we talk about the visible universe, we mean the material and radiation that we can observe. And also we must say, that we can say that the sector, what we are seeing without special equipment is very thin. We can see only a little part of the electromagnetic spectrum. And most of the "visible electromagnetic radiation" can observe by using radio, infrared, or X- and gamma-ray telescopes.

Most of that equipment must be located outside the Earth's atmosphere and the "cosmic hum" that Voyager spacecraft observed shows that there are things like radio frequencies that we can observe only outside the solar system. And most of the energy in the universe is outside the observation area of the sensors.

Things like X- and gamma-rays can not pass the Earth's atmosphere. So that means that there are large areas of "visible radiation" which we cannot see. And the most modern systems are opening new visions for physics and astronomy by observing those frequencies.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

What is pushing dark matter out from some galaxies?

In the universe is galaxies, where is no dark matter at all. That thing means that the dark matter could drop to the center or nucleus of the galaxy. In that case, the dark matter is accumulated in one place in the galaxy, and that thing is the nucleus of the galaxy. Or there is the possibility that something has been blown dark matter away from the galaxy.

So what can cause the radiation, what blows the dark matter away from the galaxy? There could be some kind of radiation vortex, like dark energy, which is interacting with dark matter. So if the source of dark energy is the oscillation of the dark matter, that means that there could be a blob of dark matter around the black hole in the center of the galaxy. And when that blob is oscillating, it could send the radiation or dark energy that pushes dark matter away from the galaxy.

 

 

 

The image I

What else could Sagittarius A be than the black hole? Could it be the blob of dark matter, what the black hole keeps in form? In that case, there should be a black hole in the nucleus of the galaxy, or the gravity of the disk of the Milky Way rips that object in pieces.

There has been introduced a theory, that maybe Sagittarius A is not a black hole at all. It would be a blob of dark matter, and that thing means actually that Sagittarius A is no supermassive black hole it's the black hole, what is collected dark matter around it. So that kind of object is the clouds of dark matter, what is surrounding the black hole, and the reason for that is that the gravity of the surrounding galaxy is extremely powerful.

And that means that there should be something, that keeps the cloud of dark matter in form. The black hole and gravity are things, that are interacting the same way to visible and dark matter. There is always the cloud of dark matter around the black holes, and those objects are the places, where the measures of the dark matter should make because the density of that material is the highest possible near the black holes.

The reason, why somebody believes that Sagittarius A is less massive than it should be is that some objects are orbiting it too close. So that means that the part of dark matter in Sagittarius A is higher than researchers have believed. And then we are finding the strange object what is stretching the nucleus of the galaxy. The name of that object is the G-2. So why G-2 can orbit so close to the Sagittarius A?

One of the explanations is that the Sagittarius A could be superpositioned. The spin of that black hole is so high that it could be superpositioned and entangled. In some cases, there is the possibility that at least some double black hole systems are superpositioned black holes.

Near the Sagittarius A is the mysterious G-2 object, which is classified as another black hole, that is orbiting Sagittarius A. When we are looking at the image of the Milky Way, we are seeing that the nucleus of the galaxy is looking like a stick rather than a ball. And that stretching is caused by the gravity of the G-2 object. But the problem is that the G-2 along with some other objects seems to orbit too close to Sagittarius A, and that thing means that Sagittarius A is lighter than scientists expected. So could that support the theory of the superpositioned black holes?

But near the nucleus of our galaxy are found stellar-type objects, which are different than other stars. Those objects are actually in the area, where the high energetic radiation affects all objects. And also the Sagittarius A is pulling the material inside it. So when material and energy are traveling to Sagittarius A, that wave movement and particles are hitting stars, which is near the supermassive object in the galaxy. That thing makes those objects more exotic than people believed.

()https://astignews.com/galaxy-without-dark-matter-found-by-astronomers/

()https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a36530817/the-center-of-the-milky-way-might-not-be-a-black-hole-after-all/

()https://www.sciencealert.com/strange-objects-have-been-found-orbiting-our-galaxy-s-supermassive-black-hole

()https://www.sciencealert.com/wild-new-paper-proposes-the-center-of-the-milky-way-might-not-be-a-black-hole?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencealert-latestnews+%28ScienceAlert-Latest%29

()https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6454/664

The image I:()https://www.universetoday.com/143622/is-the-milky-way-gaining-or-losing-mass-1/

The weaponizing the quantum technology is creating terrible visions

The electron beams are one of the frightening things, that mankind can ever imagine.

The original death ray is the electron or cathode ray, that hits the target. The electron ray will break the DNA of the living creatures, and there is the possibility that some aircraft would equip with cathode cannons. Also, there is the possibility that the cathode- or electron ray would be used in the assassination missions.

There could be a terrible version of the famous "umbrella weapon", that was used in some assassination missions by the KGB. The original umbrella weapon would be replaced by a beta-cannon. The rifle in the umbrella is replaced with a cathode accelerator.

In that case, the famous ricin shot, that killed Georgi Markov in  London in 1978 is replaced by using the electron ray. That kind of thing would be the most horrifying thing, what the weapon specialists can create.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgi_Markov

Weaponized lasers and ion systems are under research or already in use.

Weaponized lasers and ion systems are under research or already in use. The problem with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) is that the same systems can be used as engines and weapons. The thing, that is different with the ion cannons and ion engines is the distance, what the ions are in the entirety. Also, high-energetic lasers can use at the same time for sending spacecraft to the outer areas of the solar system, but they can be used as weapons.

Laser and ion cannons are things, that might be already in use. When we are seeing the fictional Star Wars movie, the laser weapons in that movie are kids game in comparison with the real-life laser systems. The most effective way to use the laser weapon is just to use the regular laser ray, which is acting like an extra-long laser sword, and that kind of thing can be done by using the regular industrial lasers.

Things like quantum annealing, where the photons can pre-load with energy before they would send to the laser system will increase the power of the laser. In that case, the regular laser would shoot the laser ray through the track, where the laser ray itself is stressed with radiation emission.

Death rays are the next-generation tools for the battlefield. The most well-known of those systems is the laser, but also ion cannons are tested. The problem with ion cannons is that if the ions with the same polarity will shoot through the particle accelerator, those ions would repel each other. So keeping the ion flow together there must shoot negative electrons in the positive ions.

The same technology, that is created for quantum computers can also be used in weapon technology. If the ionized molecules are connected and shoot to the target, that will increase the impact power of the ions. Things like quantum annealing, where the ions are loaded with energy before they are sent to the magnetic track are one of the most powerful ways to increase the power of electromagnetic weapon systems.

One possibility is to use water molecules or ionized water as the ammunition for ion cannon. In this version, the water molecules would load with an extremely high energy load, and because the water is anyway a polar molecule, the magnetic track or particle accelerator will put the water molecule fly with extremely high speed, and the impact energy of that thing is very high.

Water has a quantum quality that is not very well-known. Water molecules can be used as nano-size transistors. But it can also shoot through the particle accelerators.

But there is the possibility to make the high energetic ion cloud, and then load the target by using the opposite polar of electricity. That thing would pull the ions to the target. The ion cannons can also operate by shooting antimatter at the target. In this kind of case, the antimatter particle will shoot to target through the quantum channel, which is made by using the laser rays.

The antimatter can pack in the ions or in the fullerene chambers, where the electric fields keep the antimatter away from the material, but there is the possibility that the air would form the absolute empty channel. And antimatter can travel through that channel without contacting the material.

Weaponizing black holes is also an interesting vision. In some ideas, the quantum size black holes would use to detonate fusion bombs. At the middle of the chamber is the point, where the quantum size black hole will be formed. Then that quantum-size black hole will pull the fusion material to it. Also, the ion can shoot in the laser ray, and that laser ray would turn that traveling ion into the black hole. And then it would explode immediately causing the powerful detonation.

Also, there is the possibility that the quantum-size black hole will be formed in the chamber. When the energy pumping in that ball-shaped chamber will cut, the black hole would detonate immediately. The more stable black hole can be used to terminate almost everything, which the opponent will send against the user of that kind of thing. Even if a black hole exists in a couple of seconds, that thing will cause extremely bad destruction.

In this case, the proton or electron can turn to the black hole, and then the black hole can pack in the absolute round ball. Then that quantum-size black hole would shoot to the target, and then that ball will be broken.

The small black hole or the quantum-size singularity would explode immediately, and that thing can cause powerful explosions. The death rays are the thing, that is the most horrifying weapons, but the same technology can someday destroy the asteroid or planet, that is traveling to the solar system.

Could the Big Bang be the first and only time, when the energy turned to the material?

 

The idea is that the negative energy caused the Big Bang. But where that negative energy came from? Maybe it came from the black hole, what detonated in the giant singularity, what released all visible material and energy to the universe.

Maybe energy turned material only once. That thing happened in the Big Bang. Before the Big Bang entire material was in the black hole, and there is the possibility that there were many internal black holes. Then some of those black holes detonated because there was forming the "bubble of nothingness" inside that black hole. Then the shockwave traveled to the event horizon and turned the superstrings into ball-shaped particles or material.

If we are thinking that there are at least three types of material in the universe, hot dark matter, visible material, and cold dark matter. That thing means that there is the possibility that there were at least three internal black holes, which released their unique type of material to the universe.

The idea is that the internal black hole has a greater or higher energy load than the outer, even if it's smaller. When the higher energetic black hole detonates, the larger but lower energetic black hole cannot resist the internal gravity wave, which pushes the event horizon away. That thing causes that the black hole is exploding and the superstring is curving to the shape of the ball.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory

Can energy turn to material or not?

We don't know can energy turn to material in normal space. There is no answer for that in Einstein's Mass-Energy equivalence E=mc².

E= Energy (measured in joules, J)
m= Mass  (measured in kilograms, kg?
and
c= the speed of light. (measured in meters per second, ms -1 )

E=mc² is the formula, that tells how much material is transforming to energy. Einstein was a big man for his time, but even that kind of super-genius doesn't know everything. So the fact is that there should be counter-reaction for this kind of thing. If the mass or particular material is turning to energy, that means that the energy should have the ability to turn back to the material, but we cannot make that reaction in the real life.

Theoretically, the wave movement or superstrings should have the ability to turn to the ball, and the idea of the superstring theory is that the wave movement is the straight moving superstrings, and all quarks or some smaller particles are the balls, that are forming the superstrings.

So if the superstrings can turn straight what happens when the material is turning to wave movement, the same superstrings should have the ability to turn back to the form of the ball. But there is one little hole in that theory.

Nobody has ever seen the superstring and turned wave movement to the particle. Maybe that thing happened once in the Universe. The energy level of the Big Bang was enormous, and that thing might cause the situation where the superstrings turned to the material. But how the gravitational wave turned superstrings to ball-shaped from?

There is the possibility that the material that formed the Big Bang was in the internal black holes. And when the black hole in the great singularity explodes, that thing caused a reaction that it hits to superstrings, what was on the event horizon. Then that impact turned the heads of the superstrings to the form of the ball. And after that, the part of the superstrings turned to the material or ball-shaped particles, what was known as quarks and gluons.

()https://www.emc2-explained.info/Emc2/Basics.htm